Nikola Tesla detested relativity theory, and he derided Albert Einstein as a “white-haired crank.” Tesla supported the concept of the universal “ether,” and he raged about Einstein’s relativistic concept of “curved space.” Tesla also scoffed at the maximum possible velocity of “c” (light speed), which is a central tenet of Special Relativity.

When viewed through a modern lens, these stances appear to paint Tesla, and not Einstein, as a crank. However, Tesla might yet have the last laugh, as I will explain in this article.

On the other hand, Albert Einstein was a great skeptic of the generally accepted “truth” of quantum mechanics that uncertainty, randomness and probabilities were inherent limitations of quantum measurements. Einstein felt that quantum events and physical quantum properties should be understood, if not measurable, with very high precision. That is what led to his famous quote in a 1926 letter to Max Born: “I, in any case, am convinced He (God) does not play dice with the universe.”

This stance of Einstein, which he took with him to the grave, might make him appear to be a bit of a “crank,” as well– much as Tesla had referred to him in another context. However, Einstein might have the last laugh, too, as I will also explain in this article.

Why do I say that both Tesla and Einstein may yet have the last laugh? Because I am about to tell you the solution for one of the greatest, longest-standing mysteries of science—the famous double-slit experiment. The solution provides surprising justification for Tesla’s contentions regarding relativity theory, while simultaneously providing some solid justification for Einstein’s contentions regarding quantum mechanics.

Let us first define what is meant by a “quantum particle” or a “quantum unit” in the context of this article/ post. In a general mathematical or physics sense, and for the purpose of our elucidation of the double-slit experiment, a “quantum particle” can refer to any value that represents a discrete unit, such as a single photon. In the natural world, it is difficult to describe materials and/or phenomena which cannot be broken down into discrete units.

By the same token, we might consider an assemblage of quantum particles, taken as a whole, to be a quantum unit. For example, one electron is a quantum particle. However, one atom, which might contain many electrons among its other components, might also be called a quantum unit. One molecule, which might consist of many atoms, might be called a quantum unit. Electrons, atoms and molecules comprised of as many as 56 atoms have all successfully demonstrated wave-particle duality, as individual quantum units, within the context of the double-slit experiment.

In the same way, a planet, solar system, galaxy, or galaxy cluster might be called a quantum unit. Astronomical observations have already demonstrated that objects on cosmological scales also follow principles governed by Schrodinger’s Equation, which describes the wave-like behavior of quantum particles in what is usually considered to be small-scale quantum mechanics. See my post “Space-Time” for a reference to published observations out of Caltech regarding large-scale wave-like behavior in massive astronomical bodies, within large-scale accumulations such as accretion disks.

For those unfamiliar with the double-slit experiment, I will provide a very brief summary. For more information, there are many videos, websites, etc. with more detailed information. The double-slit experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801. By passing light through a single slit, Young demonstrated that light consists of discreet particles. By passing light through two slits, Young demonstrated that the interacting beams of light also exhibit an interference pattern, which is a hallmark of waves. Young proved that light seems to exist as both a particle and a wave—an apparent paradox.

In the 20^{th} century, things got stranger still when physicists ran electrons through the set-up, one at a time. In agreement with quantum theory, each particle seemed to interfere with itself—apparently passing through both slits simultaneously. This paradox within a paradox is why the double-slit experiment is considered by many to be the most beautiful physics experiment ever performed, as well as the strangest.

What is really happening here? Is a quantum unit both a particle and a wave? Does a quantum unit pass through both slits, simultaneously, interfering with itself as a sort of double wave? The answer to both questions is “no.” The universe is pulling a trick of perception on us, akin to the work of a master magician—much as Albert Einstein suspected regarding quantum mechanical weirdness.

To understand what is happening, both in the double-slit experiment and within large-scale astronomical accretion discs, let us step far back, and consider a duck, paddling on a lake. The duck moves forward as it paddles, but it also bobs up and down due to the waves on the lake. Essentially, the duck is a quantum unit, yet it is showing wave-like characteristics. Is the duck both a particle and a wave? Of course not. The duck is a quantum unit, and the water is the matrix which provides the wave, moving the duck up and down as it paddles forward.

Perhaps you have seen double-slit experiments involving water, demonstrating the diffraction and interference patterns produced by waves (water moving in a wave pool, in this case) passing through one or two slits. Let us add an additional element to that set-up, in the form of rubber ducks. We do not need live ducks in this demonstration, since the wave pool is providing the movement—no paddling needed.

When we allow rubber ducks to ride the waves through a single slit in a break wall, the ducks will disperse in a simple diffraction pattern, much like electrons in a single-slit experiment. Now the next part gets much more interesting.

When we add a second slit in the break wall, the waves of water passing through each slit interfere with each other, resulting in a complex interference pattern—tall wave crests where they constructively interfere, and shallow troughs where the waves destructively interfere.

Now, when we release rubber ducks to ride the waves through two slits in the break wall, they no longer follow a simple diffraction pattern. Instead, the ducks disperse via the wave crests into a complex interference pattern, just as photons dispersed in Young’s original double-slit experiment. The more energetic constructively interfering wave crests draw the ducks away from the trough and into the heavier wave action. Now the next part gets much, much more interesting.

When we release the rubber ducks one at a time, some ducks will pass through the left slit, and some will pass through the right slit. Ducks do not pass through both slits at the same time. Yet since the interference pattern is a function of the water matrix—not a function of the ducks themselves—the ducks still are drawn onto the wave crests, and are dispersed in a complex interference pattern, exactly matching the apparently doubly paradoxical observation of electrons released one at a time in the double-slit experiment.

So do the rubber ducks exist as both particles and waves, each duck passing through both slits, simultaneously, in some sort of quantum mechanical voodoo? Of course not. They are quantum units, simply riding the waves of their matrix, and passing through one slit or the other.

What, then, provides the matrix in the double-slit experiment? To answer that question, let us look at the mystery of space-time. I have read many, many times that nobody understands space-time. Well, I understand space-time, and I am going to explain it to you, in simple and basic terms, right now.

“Space-time” is a misleading term for what I am going to describe. The universe certainly can be measured in terms of length, width, and height, so space does exist. And movement necessitates the passage of time, so time exists, as well. But there is a continuum of energy that pervades all of space, and all of time. For the purposes of this article, we will refer to this overall field of energy as the Space-Time Energy Continuum (STEC), to differentiate it from the more obvious continuum of space-time itself.

There is an inherent movement to this STEC, and, importantly, the STEC can only interact with mass/energy at a single velocity, which we know of as c, or the “speed of light” (another misleading term, as it turns out). The STEC moves in the form of a wave, and it is the very nature of the STEC that it travels at all velocities, and all wavelengths, making it a truly all-encompassing energy field continuum.

The STEC is the matrix in which all quantum matter exists. The STEC passes through the slits in the double-slit experiment, and photons, electrons, atoms or molecule simply ride the waves of the STEC. The STEC waves pass through a single slit in a simple diffraction pattern, as do the electrons that it carries along. STEC waves pass through each of two slits, and the two waves of STEC interfere with each other, carrying the electrons on the crests of the resultant interference pattern, making it appear that the electrons themselves are behaving as bizarre self-interfering waves. A good trick! Attempting to measure what is happening in one of the slits disrupts the waves of the STEC, therefore disrupting the STEC interference pattern, resulting in electrons collapsing back into a simple diffraction pattern—i.e. as “particles,” rather than “waves,” per the observation in the classic experiment.

On astrophysical scales, cosmological masses such as asteroids, planets and stars also surf the waves of the STEC. That is why we can describe mysterious ripples which occur in large-scale astronomical discs by using the Schrodinger equation, which governs the behavior of fundamental particles, and therefore is the basic equation of quantum mechanics. The quantum unit of a star is not so different than the quantum particle of an electron, then. Both surf the waves of the STEC. A star is not both a particle and a wave, and neither is an electron. They are both simply particles, or quantum units, riding the waves of the STEC.

The mathematical equations that describe a curvature of space-time when interacted with by matter are describing the curvature of this energy field, the STEC. It is this energy field, the STEC, which propels matter towards the greatest curvature. If gravitation involves the movement of matter, what is the source of the energy required for this movement? It is the energy of the STEC. In fact, the STEC always moves matter in the direction of the slowest passage of time—therefore gravitation might possibly be referred to as the Fourth Law of Thermodynamics—the Conservation of Time.

Now what would Albert Einstein think about all this? Well, he I think he would say that this is proof that at least one weirdo concept of quantum uncertainty is not true, just as he thought. While quantum mechanics dogma tells us that an electron passes through two slits at the same time, we now see that there is a clearly understandable physical truth behind the phenomenon, instead.

As for Tesla, no doubt he would be pleased, also. The STEC is a nice proxy for his concept of the “ether,” although instead of a diffuse “gas” as he described the ether, the STEC is an overall energy field. And we can see that Tesla might have had a very good point about the curvature of space-time, also. It is not space or time that is curved, but rather the STEC itself, interacting with mass/energy and compelling it to follow the curvature of the STEC (as in gravitational lensing), or to push it/ pull it down a gradient towards the slowest passage of time (the gravitational force itself). In Tesla’s terminology, it is the “ether” (the STEC) that is curved, not space-time. I admit I was surprised when I realized that I agree with him on this point.

And what of the universal velocity limitation of c, that Tesla disagreed with? Well, the STEC exists throughout the entirety of three-dimensional space, and at all velocities. That is why a traveler moving at any velocity still experiences the STEC at the singular velocity of c, so the STEC itself certainly violates this basic stance of Special Relativity.

In my earlier post “The Greatest and Grandest Illusion (Part I),” and in much greater detail in my book, I discuss the misinterpretation of the Lorentz Relativistic Velocity Transformations, and why that misinterpretation led to the incorrect assumption that nothing can travel faster than c in the universe. Not only must the STEC violate that assumption, but I am also convinced that it exists over an unlimited range of velocities, as does quantum mass/energy, in general, in our universe. I will soon begin to write a post describing what I call “hyper-dimensional space-time”, but until then I will leave you with this: Tesla was correct about the speed limit of c, also. The universe doesn’t put any limitations on velocity, at all. Hyper-dimensional space-time allows faster-than-light travel.

Many Facebook users are not book readers, but if this subject is intriguing to you, and you’d like a deeper understanding of wave-particle duality, dark matter, dark energy, and much more, you might want to try something a little different, and read my book. For an almost insignificant cost, you too can understand what I like to refer to as “the secret of the universe.”

Meanwhile, the next time somebody writes or says that nobody understands the true nature of the space-time continuum, you will be able to tell them that understanding space-time involves understanding the STEC. Once you understand how the STEC interacts with mass/energy, and causes its movement within the space-time continuum, you are on your way to understanding many other “mysteries” of the universe.

If you are still with me, I thank you for reading the post. If you want to read the next post (which hopefully will be out in the next several weeks), then please “like” The Enlightening Facebook Page, if you haven’t already, and hopefully you’ll see the post when it comes across your timeline. The Enlightening is not posting with great frequency, but I am trying to make the posts very significant, and more specific. Let’s unravel this thing, together.

Sincerely, Kevin Goczeski, author of The Enlightening